2005 Turner Cutaway
Moderators: Christopher Bara, Peggy Turner
-
- KILL CITY RACING
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Detroit
2005 Turner Cutaway
Prototype model cut to the shape of a vintage '70's Sims-Turner
Clear grip tape over the entire top with cutouts for black strips for the retro look
Geezer-X RTX106 up front with a Chicken offset Indy in the rear, Cut-Avalons and Pleasure Tool Ceramic Bearings.
Extremely lightweight, excellent construction
And damn nice looking to boot....Beautiful board Mr. Church!!
Clear grip tape over the entire top with cutouts for black strips for the retro look
Geezer-X RTX106 up front with a Chicken offset Indy in the rear, Cut-Avalons and Pleasure Tool Ceramic Bearings.
Extremely lightweight, excellent construction
And damn nice looking to boot....Beautiful board Mr. Church!!
-
- 1961-2013 (RIP)
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:00 am
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:17 pm
- Location: Calgary, AB, CANADA
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:37 pm
- Location: ketchum, Idaho
- Contact:
-
- KILL CITY RACING
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Detroit
It's a decal...this was a prototype deck and 66's may have been made after it. Skating on a deck with rolled edges?....it takes a little getting used to. Your heel and toes will roll at the edges a bit, and that feels allot different than a flat or concave deck. The first few times i tried, i was scared of slipping off, but after a few runs, it gets better. It gets up to speed very fast and to be honest, i just wasnt good enough to ride one a year ago, but i've been practicing. The secret for me was to put tape down right to the point that the sides turn convex. Also nice to see the huge cambers on the new boards...adn the finish is top shelf
Noah...come to Chicago or Golden this year...i'll be bringing it with me wherever i go so more folks can try out the new ones.
Noah...come to Chicago or Golden this year...i'll be bringing it with me wherever i go so more folks can try out the new ones.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:09 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
-
- Harbor Skateboard Racing
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: Los Angeles
I'm wondering the same thing as Greg O - what's with the rounded deck rails on some Turners? Being a relative newcomer to this sport, I never skated any of the original Turners (or any other Turners). It just seems to me that it would hinder turning. All my decks are concave or at least have sharp deck rails. I can't imagine skating a deck with no edge like that. Can some experienced Turner riders set me straight?
-
- KILL CITY RACING
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Detroit
Here's the scoop on the new ones (at least the one i got, Stanziale may want to say something about his too)
this board is 17mm thick, compared to my old Bobby board that's 14mm's and the new Vinnie one that's 12mm. Despite that, it's noticably lighterweight. Not sure if the weight savings is in the foam or the shell, but when the box came, it felt like it was empty.
The rolled edges are different than the older ones. On the older ones, the rolled edge was at a more gradual pitch. By that i mean that it started tapering down about 1/2-3/4" from the side, resulting in a bit less deckspace. This new one has a sharper radius and angles down within 1/4" from the side. Still a rolled edge, but not like they used to be.
The camber is actually at it's highest point under the front foot, not in the middle. I think that's what makes the difference in the pump, because it picks up speed very quickly.
As for the ride, i think it matters on how you set your feet. If you ride cones with your feet set like a park board, with toes on one side and the heel on the other, it may feel a bit uncomfortable. I ride modified stance, and the edge of my toes and heel rest on the rolled edge. I actually like the way that feels, though it's different than flat and concaved decks.
Like other handmade boards, a web-sketch isnt as good as a picture, which isnt as good as holding one in your hands, which isnt as good as riding one which isnt as good as owning one. That's about the best way i can explain it.
this board is 17mm thick, compared to my old Bobby board that's 14mm's and the new Vinnie one that's 12mm. Despite that, it's noticably lighterweight. Not sure if the weight savings is in the foam or the shell, but when the box came, it felt like it was empty.
The rolled edges are different than the older ones. On the older ones, the rolled edge was at a more gradual pitch. By that i mean that it started tapering down about 1/2-3/4" from the side, resulting in a bit less deckspace. This new one has a sharper radius and angles down within 1/4" from the side. Still a rolled edge, but not like they used to be.
The camber is actually at it's highest point under the front foot, not in the middle. I think that's what makes the difference in the pump, because it picks up speed very quickly.
As for the ride, i think it matters on how you set your feet. If you ride cones with your feet set like a park board, with toes on one side and the heel on the other, it may feel a bit uncomfortable. I ride modified stance, and the edge of my toes and heel rest on the rolled edge. I actually like the way that feels, though it's different than flat and concaved decks.
Like other handmade boards, a web-sketch isnt as good as a picture, which isnt as good as holding one in your hands, which isnt as good as riding one which isnt as good as owning one. That's about the best way i can explain it.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:37 pm
- Location: ketchum, Idaho
- Contact:
-
- KILL CITY RACING
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Detroit
-
- Red Clay Racing
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Athens, GA
- Contact:
edited by the author for content
Last edited by Rick Stanziale on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KILL CITY RACING
- Posts: 637
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Detroit
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:09 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
I just used a currency converter and 220 GBP is $409.47 as of now. That's a lot of money for a deck but look at it! It's beautiful! I vowed to buy one as soon as I felt I deserved one or the USD overtakes or comes close to the GBP.Christopher Bara wrote:220 Great British Pounds........and as long as we keep fighting Georges War, and the dollar sags, then it's a tough exchange rate......i'd recommend you send an Email to Steve Church at Turner Summer Ski and get a quote directly from him in US bucks...never hurts to ask, aye?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2002 2:00 am
- Location: Buckingham, England
- Contact:
turner pricing
we realise that with the us dollars' poor performance against sterling our products are becoming more and more expensive to our american customers - to help out we have instigated our own conversion rate of 1.5 dollars to the pound which means, for example, that we can offer our cutaway & fullnose models at $330 usd.
thanks,
steve church
www.turnersummerski.com
thanks,
steve church
www.turnersummerski.com
-
- 1961-2013 (RIP)
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:00 am
-
- Jim Slater
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: London ENGLAND
New materials, exchange rate and the cost.
Hi all,
It is a shame that the exchange rate is on the s**ty side at the moment.
As with Chris's beauty and the Red monster that I now have (posted elsewhere on this forum), how can I put this into words?
It's a heavy price to pay yes, but as I said before, what price perfection?
These new materials are more akin to carbon than glass and mine looks like it is one piece of carved carbon fibre.
In early 1977 (after washing about 100 cars) I paid equal to 450 USD in todays money for my first Turner cutaway. in the days when Wheels were the equivalent to 11.00 USD a set.
All i can say is these new boards are not only true to the legend, but an improvement beyond all Bob Turners dreams.
The downhill Gun is amazing but (Absolutely no offence meant Wesley) not really a fair comparison in cost sense as it is nearly double the materials.
As far as I am concerned if alot of this money is going into R&D, as Steve Church informs me, then this can only be a good thing and the more they sell then who's to say. that they will not be produced on both sides of the pond one day?
At least the Turner name continues.
Many may dissagree but that is my feeling on the subject.
It is alot of money none the less but WELL WORTH IT.
PS: No, I dont work on commission for the company LOL
Regards to you all
Jim Slater
It is a shame that the exchange rate is on the s**ty side at the moment.
As with Chris's beauty and the Red monster that I now have (posted elsewhere on this forum), how can I put this into words?
It's a heavy price to pay yes, but as I said before, what price perfection?
These new materials are more akin to carbon than glass and mine looks like it is one piece of carved carbon fibre.
In early 1977 (after washing about 100 cars) I paid equal to 450 USD in todays money for my first Turner cutaway. in the days when Wheels were the equivalent to 11.00 USD a set.
All i can say is these new boards are not only true to the legend, but an improvement beyond all Bob Turners dreams.
The downhill Gun is amazing but (Absolutely no offence meant Wesley) not really a fair comparison in cost sense as it is nearly double the materials.
As far as I am concerned if alot of this money is going into R&D, as Steve Church informs me, then this can only be a good thing and the more they sell then who's to say. that they will not be produced on both sides of the pond one day?
At least the Turner name continues.
Many may dissagree but that is my feeling on the subject.
It is alot of money none the less but WELL WORTH IT.
PS: No, I dont work on commission for the company LOL
Regards to you all
Jim Slater
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:37 pm
- Location: ketchum, Idaho
- Contact: